Mental Health in Focus: Prevalence, Treatment, Stigma & Self-Care Strategies

Okay. So, you know how the world just feels 
like it’s overflowing with information? Oh, absolutely. Constant streams. Yeah. Exactly. 
And it’s tough to cut through that noise to really get informed without feeling, you know, 
completely swamped. Mhm. So, that’s what we try to do here on the deep dive. And today, we’re 
taking a really close look at mental health in America. Really important topic right now. 
Definitely. We’re drawing from three key sources. the 2024 state of mental health in America 
report. That’s the big one from MHA. Right. Also, a comprehensive approach to suicide prevention 
and a guide to reducing behavioral health disorder stigma. Yeah. And our goal here for you listening 
is really to weave these together. We want to help you get a solid understanding of um the current 
needs, the access issues, pinpoint the big challenges we’re up against, and then explore 
some of the solutions, especially looking at stigma reduction and uh better systemic support. 
So, let’s jump right into that MHA report, the 2024 one. What’s it actually trying to do? What’s 
it measuring this year? Okay, so the MHA report, its main goals are well, first to give a clear 
snapshot. Think of it like a picture of where things stand right now. Mostly for policy and 
planning. Okay. Snapshot. Got it. Yeah. And then it aims to track changes over time, understand 
how policies might be working or not working, and really just to get people talking more, 
improve outcomes. They’re pretty strict about the data they use. How so? Well, it has to be publicly 
available, current, cover all 50 states plus DC, include both adults and youth, capture the 
whole mental health system, and importantly, let them track it year-over-year. Right. So, what 
key things did they look at for 2024? So, the big ones include adults with any mental illness or 
AMI, youth with at least one major depressive episode, MDE. Okay. Uh substance use disorder SUD 
for both adults and youth. And they added some new things this year, too, like youth flourishing, 
which is interesting. We’ll come back to that. And adults with SUD who needed treatment but didn’t 
get it. A crucial gap measure. Now, you mentioned something really important before we started 
this 2024 report. It’s not quite like the others. It’s more of a snapshot. Exactly. This is super 
critical context. Basically, the pandemic, CO 19, it really changed how national surveys collected 
data starting in 2020. How did it change? Well, they used to be mostly in-person interviews. But 
from 2020, federal agencies started using online questionnaires too. Ah, okay. And that mix of web 
and in person creates what researchers call a mode effect. It means the way people answer might be 
different depending on how they’re asked. So the numbers aren’t directly comparable. Precisely. You 
can’t reliably compare the 2024 numbers which use this mixed mode data directly with the pre2021 
numbers that were mostly in person. It’s like a reset on the trend line. That’s a perfect way to 
put it. It’s a trend break. We have to see this year’s data as a really important standalone 
snapshot and not just the next point on an old graph. It changes how we interpret everything. 
Okay, that’s really crucial context. Thanks. So, shifting then, focusing on that snapshot. Yeah, 
let’s talk about youth. The numbers here get well, pretty sobering. They really do. The report found 
20.17%. I mean, that’s almost one in five kids aged 1217 had at least one major depressive 
episode in the past year. One in five. That’s staggering. And for 15% of those kids, it caused 
severe impairment like trouble functioning dayto-day. at school, you know. And if you look 
at the uh the 2021 youth risk behavior survey, the YRBS, it found 42% of high schoolers felt 
persistently sad or hopeless. It paints a bigger picture, a very worrying picture. And then there’s 
the treatment gap. Nearly 3 million young people with MDE didn’t get any treatment. 3 million? 
Yeah. And even for those who did get treatment, only about what 57.2% said it actually helped 
them. O, that effectiveness number is tough, too, right? And it varies a lot by state. like DC 
was around 16% but Oregon was almost 25% for youth MDE prevalence. And connecting back to that YRBS 
data from 2021, there’s a really stark disparity we need to highlight. It showed that 45% of LGBTQ 
plus high school students seriously considered attempting suicide. 45%. Wow. Compared to compared 
to 15% of heterosexual students, that’s a massive difference and really underscores, you know, 
the disproportionate risk certain groups face. Absolutely crucial to remember that disparity. 
Okay, let’s shift focus to adults. Substance use disorder, SUD, you mentioned that measure. 
Yes. The report shows quite a range there too, right? Like Utah at about 14% prevalence. 
California closer to 20%. That’s right. Significant numbers across the board. And um 
just to add another layer of severity here, 2022 saw the highest number of deaths by suicide 
ever recorded in the US ever. That’s that’s a deeply concerning statistic. It is. It represents 
a profound loss and highlights the urgency of the crisis. So you have all these people struggling, 
youth and adults, but then trying to find help. The report mentions this ratio, 340 people 
for every one mental health provider in the country. Yeah, that number is just it jumps off 
the page, doesn’t it? It really does. What does that practically mean for someone looking for 
care? It means huge waiting lists. It means maybe the only provider who takes your insurance 
is booked for 6 months. It means limited choices, maybe no choices in some areas, especially rural 
ones. It’s a fundamental access crisis. And what about the reasons people don’t get treatment, 
especially for SUDD? The report digs into that. And the reasons are, well, complex. The biggest 
one, a staggering 75.4% of adults with SED who needed treatment thought they should handle it on 
their own. Wow, that sounds like stigma playing a role there. Absolutely. Internalized stigma, maybe 
societal pressure. Then you have 58.6% 6% saying they weren’t ready to start treatment. Cost is 
huge, too. 47.7% and almost the same number, 47.3% just didn’t know where to go for help. 
Just basic navigation issues. Exactly. And then there’s the insurance piece. People needing 
behavioral health care go out of network way more often than for physical health. Like 10.6 times 
more often for psychologists. One time. Yeah. 8.9 times for psychiatrists compared to medical 
doctors. And a big reason for that is often lower reimbursement rates for mental health providers 
which pushes them out of insurance networks just to make a living. That’s a systemic problem right 
there. Okay. So the picture is challenging but you mentioned something earlier. Youth flourishing. 
Tell me about that. It sounds like a positive indicator. It is and it’s really important. It’s 
a shift away from only looking at deficits or illness. Right. Youth flourishing measures things 
like curiosity, resilience, self-regulation, kind of the building blocks of positive mental 
health. So, how are kids doing on that measure? Nationally, the average is about 60.5% of youth 
meeting all three criteria. It varies, of course. Georgia was highest around 67%. Kentucky lowest 
around 54%. But measuring this helps us understand not just the absence of problems, but the presence 
of strengths. It’s about proactively building well-being which could be protective. That’s a 
great perspective. Okay. So, we have the data, the challenge is the access issues, but underlying 
so much of this, as you hinted, is stigma. Mhm. It’s like this huge invisible barrier. How does 
the anti-stigma guide define it? What does it feel like? The guide calls it a roadblock on 
the journey of recovery. It makes people feel powerless, angry, frustrated, and it breaks it 
down into a few types. Okay? There’s internalized stigma. That’s when someone starts believing the 
negative stereotypes about themselves, thinking, you know, I’m worthless or this is my fault. 
Right. Turning it inward. Exactly. Then there’s external stigma which can come from different 
places even sometimes within the recovery community itself like judging someone’s path maybe 
medication versus abstinence. Interesting within the community. Yeah. And then there’s stigma from 
treatment providers or medical professionals. Maybe biases, lack of education, belief that 
treatment doesn’t really work that affects the care people get. That’s worrying. Definitely. And 
finally, systemic stigma. This is discrimination baked into systems like criminal justice, 
social services leading to denial of housing, jobs, proper treatment. So, it’s everywhere 
pretty much. And the bigger picture effect, it erodess confidence that mental health 
conditions are actually treatable like any other health condition. How does that play out? 
Well, it directly stops people from seeking help. Fear of judgment, fear their boss will find out, 
fear of confidentiality breaches. And maybe more insidiously, it gives this kind of unspoken 
permission for insurers to limit coverage for mental health in ways they’d never get away 
with for say heart disease. That’s a powerful connection. And the MHA report points to other 
systemic issues too, right? Like in rural areas. Yes, absolutely. Rural communities often face a 
double whammy. Higher poverty rates and much less access to preventative care and providers and 
schools. Schools are struggling too. The report mentioned significant staffing issues in 2022 like 
45% of schools reporting vacancies for special education staff and 78% saying they had trouble 
hiring that staff. That directly impacts kids who need support. Right. And you mentioned earlier how 
some policies, even maybe well-intentioned ones, can backfire. Yeah, that’s an important point. 
The report touches on how policies pushing for involuntary hospitalization, for example, okay, 
can actually make people less likely to seek help voluntarily when they feel a crisis coming on. In 
2022, almost a quarter of adults with any mental illness and 45% nearly half of youth with MDE who 
didn’t get care cited fear of hospitalization or involuntary treatment as a reason. Wow, that’s 
a huge percentage for youth. It is. It suggests maybe resources could be better used focusing 
upstream on prevention and accessible voluntary care rather than solely on crisis response and 
forced treatment, which clearly scares people away. Okay, so the challenges, the barriers, 
including stigma and system issues are really clear, but let’s pivot towards solutions. 
What concrete steps are being talked about? You mentioned a comprehensive approach. Exactly. 
No single magic bullet. It requires attacking the problem from multiple angles simultaneously. 
The suicide prevention guide outlines nine key strategies and some are really promising. 
But what? Give us some examples. Okay, so one is enhancing life skills and resilience. 
Think upstream prevention. Connecticut has this great program called Gizmo’s Pawsum Guide to 
Mental Health. Pretty attitude name. It is, but it’s serious stuff for elementary kids. Teaches 
coping skills, how to identify trusted adults, build social connection. It’s about equipping 
kids early. Building that foundation. Makes sense. What else? Responding effectively to crisis. The 
988 suicide and crisis lifeline is a huge step. getting that nationwide 247 access to trained 
counselors, referrals, mobile crisis teams when needed. It’s a vital safety net. Yeah, 988 is 
critical. Then there’s reducing access to lethal means. This is often sensitive but crucial 
for suicide prevention. Maryland’s extreme risk protection order law is an example allowing 
temporary removal of firearms if someone showing clear warning signs of danger to self or others. 
Okay, a specific policy example. Another big one is promoting social connectedness. We know 
isolation is a risk factor. The guide talks about supportive neighborhoods. Sadly, only about 
56% of US families felt their kids lived in one in 202122. We need to foster that sense of community. 
So important, but hard to legislate. True. But policies can help create the conditions for it 
like upstream prevention through economic support. State earned income tax credits, EITC’s, are a 
great example. How do they help mental health? by reducing poverty and financial stress on 
families, which directly impacts parental stress and improves kids health outcomes. It’s a powerful 
lever. Yet, the report notes 15 states still don’t have a state EITC. H missed opportunity there. 
Definitely. And finally, addressing housing stability. You can’t focus on recovery if you 
don’t know where you’ll sleep. Housing first programs are evidence-based. They prioritize 
getting people into stable housing first, then wrap services around them. The VA, the Department 
of Veterans Affairs, credits these programs with helping cut veteran homelessness by over half 
since 2010. It works. That’s impressive progress. Now, connecting back to that stigma piece, the 
anti-stigma guide has this really simple but powerful phrase. Words have power. Language 
matters. People first. Yes, it’s fundamental. It sounds simple, but why is it so hard to get 
people, even professionals, to consistently use person first language? like saying a person with 
schizophrenia instead of a schizophrenic. That’s a great question. I think part of it is just habit 
inertia. It’s how terms have been used sometimes for decades. Mhm. Another part might be a lack of 
awareness or training on why it matters. It’s not just political correctness. It’s about seeing the 
person before the diagnosis. It avoids defining someone by their illness. Right? The toolkit 
stresses using accurate non-stigmatizing terms, avoiding sensationalism, not co-opting medical 
terms casually like saying someone is addicted to shopping or whatever. Yeah. That dilutes the 
meaning. Exactly. Making that conscious shift empowers individuals. It fosters hope and it keeps 
the conversation grounded in respect and evidence. So, how do you amplify that message? The guide 
talks about media advocacy. How is that different from just like a PSA campaign? Good distinction. 
And media advocacy is more strategic. It’s not just about raising general awareness. It’s 
about intentionally reframing the public debate. Reframing by shifting the focus from individual 
blame or problems to societal issues and systemic solutions, it aims to change collective behavior 
and empower the public to actually get involved in policy change. Okay. More actionoriented 
definitely. And there are principles for doing it effectively. You need to use data, use 
research on communication, social learning theory, things like that. You have to commit to the 
long haul. Attitudes don’t change overnight. Frame the narrative around shared responsibility 
and solutions, not just doom and gloom. Focus on hope and action. Yes. And critically involve 
people with lived experience every step of the way. Designing the campaign, evaluating it. 
Their voice is essential. So practically speaking, if a group wants to do this kind of advocacy, what 
does the guide suggest? It gets pretty practical. Things like develop a memorable campaign name, a 
good logo, create clear, concise fact sheets, easy bullet points. Make it digestible. Exactly. Build 
a website. Use social media. Obviously crucial now. Write effective press releases. Remember 
the classic who, what, when, where, why. Keep them short, like 250, 300 words. Get to the point, 
right? And if you’re doing press conferences or interviews, be accurate. Be prepared. Know your 
key messages and stick to them. Stay professional even with tough questions. Solid advice for 
any kind of communication really. Absolutely. Wow. Okay. We’ve covered a lot of ground today 
from that really crucial data snapshot and the MHA report. The trend break, right? To digging 
into the impact of stigma, the systemic barriers like access and workforce shortages. Yeah. and 
then exploring these comprehensive strategies, prevention, crisis care, housing, EITC, language, 
advocacy. It’s clear the challenges are huge. But you know, there are dedicated people and solid 
strategies, working to make things better. Absolutely. And it really highlights that just 
knowing facts isn’t enough, right? It’s about deeply understanding the context, thinking 
critically, and then figuring out how to apply that knowledge. Yeah. Especially with something 
as complex as mental health. So, thinking about our listeners, what does this all mean for 
you? We’ve seen the scale of the challenges, but also the strategic efforts underway. It really 
makes you think if changing public perception, changing policy, changing the language we use 
is so vital, what’s one small immediate shift maybe in your own words, your daily interactions 
that could add to that wave of dstigmatization. How could that maybe, just maybe, encourage 
someone else to reach out for the help they need?

Explore the multifaceted world of mental health—from national prevalence and treatment access to societal perceptions and personal wellness habits. This video draws on key sources including a state-by-state report on mental health in America, a pediatric guide to self-care techniques like deep breathing and exercise, and expert-backed strategies from the PTTC Network to reduce stigma through affirming language and media advocacy. We also highlight academic insights into the neurobiology of mental illness, the impact of social media, and the holistic benefits of physical activity. Whether you’re a student, professional, or curious viewer, this is your comprehensive guide to understanding and supporting mental well-being in today’s world.

SUBSCRIBE for more healthy tips:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2LxjnHod1wnhm2m2GERIHg?sub_confirmation=1

Disclaimer:
The information provided in this video is for educational and personal information purposes only. Please consult a physician for advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

#MentalHealth #health #cure #medication #healthyaging

mental health awareness,

mental health in America,

self-care strategies,

behavioral health stigma,

deep breathing techniques,

exercise for mental wellness,

affirming language in mental health,

mental health statistics by state,

social determinants of mental health,

pediatric mental health tips,

mental health and social media,

neurobiology of mental illness,

benefits of exercise for mental health,

mental health advocacy campaigns,

mental health essay examples,

mental health education resources,

reducing stigma in behavioral health,

mental health treatment access,

mental health rankings by state,

mental health and media influence,

Leave A Reply